🔗 Share this article

Over the weekend, Battlefield Studios launched a fresh game mode titled Casual Breakthrough. To put it simply, this option resembles the standard Breakthrough setup but features a few key adjustments:

• Each team includes just 8 real players, with the remaining made up of AI-controlled opponents.
• Activities performed by human gamers award complete experience points, while AI activities offer reduced XP.
• Only two maps can be played: Siege of Cairo and Empire State.
• Features like Player tags, accolades, and stat tracking have been turned off.

In short, the playlist delivers on its title: it's a casual version of Breakthrough. On the surface, you might think it's a good idea, as it gives more options for gamers looking for different ways to enjoy the game. However, gaming history have taught us anything, it is that you can't please everyone. In other words, a lot of Battlefield 6 fans are upset.

Community Responses: From Fury to Praise

"People want human opponents. Avoid making the mistakes of your rivals," states a response to the mode reveal. "Truly disappointing concept," says another. At the same time, in community forums, a player remarks, "I have no idea where we are headed with this title," while someone else details all the issues they consider to be broken in Battlefield 6: "Resolve glitches, address drone issues, correct rocket mechanics, adjust aiming after sprinting, improve hit detection. We don't need this AI-heavy playlist."

On the other hand, amid the criticism, there are players explaining how much they're liking the new mode. "It's enjoyable to practice, human participants prevent it from being a complete grind but it's quite laid-back," says a forum post. "The community doesn't understand that there are players who actually go outside and can't play this game all the time. Allow them to strike a balance," adds another. One reply via social media clarifies that as they're "a parent gamer with busy schedules, this is great for me," and another praises the mode for "not being overcompetitive."

Valid Concerns and Player Feedback

All that said, players have valid points to criticize Casual Breakthrough. Some users have highlighted that it could increase wait times even longer for different playlists due to the sheer number of playlists in the game already. Similarly, certain regions often face mostly bots in the current modes. Additionally, it appears somewhat counterintuitive that the mode does not begin without a required amount of real players, even though it focuses mostly on combat against bots.

Lastly, one of the biggest grievances is that Battlefield Portal was promised to offer complete rewards, even against bots, but that got canned when they tried to remove XP farming from the system. Thus this new playlist seems like the player base compromising in the middle, as per a Reddit comment. A different user labels this addition as the devs "dropping the ball significantly, I experienced great enjoyment in the first couple of days, why did they feel the need to change it?"

Looking Ahead: Will Changes Occur?

Should Battlefield Studios has proven anything so far with the latest installment, it's that they're paying attention and acting on feedback. Assignments that were overly hard were adjusted rapidly, just like the specific battle pass objectives. It is likely that, should analytics indicates this recent mode isn't performing to their expectations, they won't be shy to change it again.