🔗 Share this article

At first, Trump gave the impression to adopt a strong position regarding the Ukrainian conflict. Following making threats of "severe repercussions" in August in case Russia's president carried on blocking truce discussions, the former president finally enacted considerable penalties on Russia's primary petroleum corporations, Lukoil and Rosneft. This decision significantly impacted the Russian leader's capacity to finance his aggression in the region.

Yet, via his latest comprehensive peace initiative for Ukraine, reportedly developed by US and Russian officials lacking Ukraine's or European involvement, the former president has apparently reverted to his pro-Putin stance.

Benefiting Military Action

This proposal would in practice favor the Russian leader for invading Ukraine while leaving the country's democratic system in jeopardy. Although bold declarations that "The nation's autonomy will be affirmed", large portions of the proposal in reality compromise that same sovereignty. Seen as a Moscow's wish would likely be a disaster for Ukraine.

Demonstrating his corporate experience, Trump persists to consider the situation in Ukraine as a simple border issue, implying handing Putin a portion of Ukrainian soil will appease the president. Yet, Russia's military campaign is not simply about controlling a charred area of industrial-devastated land in eastern Ukraine. Instead, it's about Ukraine's political system – and the Russian leader's apparent goal to eliminate it so it no longer acts as an appealing example for the Russia's population of the democratic leadership that his growing dictatorship denies them.

Territorial Concessions

While freezing in position the presently divided regions of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, the plan would force the nation to surrender the whole this eastern territory. Aside from rewarding Russia with area that its forces have been unsuccessful to occupy in exceeding a ten years of conflict, this giveaway would leave Ukraine's defenses dangerously compromised.

The area is the site of the nation's much-vaunted "stronghold system", the entrenched military defenses that are a critical obstacle to invading forces. The proposal would have the Ukrainian military leave these positions, giving Russian forces a unobstructed route to Kyiv in case he later decide to restart the war.

Armed Forces Limitations

Then, in a step that would make additional hostilities simpler for the Russian military, Trump would require Ukraine to cut the numbers of its armed forces from their present approximately 800,000 troops to a maximum of this lower number. Significantly, Trump's plan imposes no similar restrictions on Russia's military.

Seemingly as a gesture to Russia's efforts to depict Ukraine's legitimate government as extremists, the plan declares: "Every extremist ideology and practices must be condemned and prohibited." Apparently to underscore this aspect, it insists that "Ukraine will hold democratic votes in 100 days" of a truce. Meanwhile, Trump imposes no requirement that Putin risk his authoritarian rule by allowing elections in Russia.

Defense Assurances

To be sure, the proposal makes Russia pledge not to "invade neighboring countries" and to "incorporate in law its stance of peaceful relations towards the EU and the Ukrainian people". But considering that Putin has violated similar agreements in the previous instances – such as the Budapest accord, in which Russia committed to recognize the nation's territorial integrity in exchange for surrendering its former Soviet nuclear arsenal, and the previous peace deals, in which Moscow committed to a ceasefire and a handback of seized land in the region to Kyiv – for what reason should the international community believe this commitment on this occasion?

That is why the Ukrainian government has been so adamant on international security guarantees. Although the proposal warns of a "strong unified military response" in case the Russian Federation resume its military campaign, and states that "Ukraine will receive strong protection assurances", the particulars include vague to alarming. The initiative would not only block Ukraine accession to NATO but also prevent alliance nations from positioning troops on Ukrainian territory, thereby blocking the reassurance force, likely commanded by European powers, on which Ukraine had been relying to prevent Putin from restoring his weakened forces, rearming, and resuming aggression.

World Reaction

A separate side agreement apparently would provide Ukraine with a alliance-like security guarantee, in which any future "serious, planned, and sustained armed attack" by Russia on Ukraine "will be treated as an assault endangering the stability and safety of the transatlantic community." That suggests a military response. Yet in contrast to a powerful Ukrainian military – Ukraine's best defense against additional invasion – the success of the side agreement would hinge on the commitment of Nato leaders, like Trump, to react with force to Putin's aggression, an action they have {not